Skip Navigation

Appendix A: Performance and Resource Tables

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1.2

Advance responsible economic growth and trade while protecting American security

OBJECTIVE 1.2 RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $114.0 $119.9 $130.9 $160.4 $162.5 $163.4 $187.7 $187.1
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 749 773 733 929 795 984 992 942

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Identify and resolve unfair trade practices (ITA)1

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $55.0 $59.0 $68.0 $92.8 $85.8 $89.5 $110.7 $104.9
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 372 375 360 571 341 576 630 589

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of AD/CVD proceedings completed within statutory deadlines
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 100% 100%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 100%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 100%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 100%
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 100%
FY 2001   New—no target to measure against

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of market access and trade compliance cases initiated
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 178 150
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 160
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 161
FY 2003 Red (Did not meet target) 144
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of market access and compliance cases initiated for on behalf of small and medium-sized businesses1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 20061 Red (Did not meet target) 28.1% 30%
Performance was not met, because:
This was a new metric. ITA’s initial target may require adjustment as baseline data becomes available.
1 This is a new measure as of FY 2006, so there are no historical results to present. (back)

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of market access and compliance cases resolved
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 140 80
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 85
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) 116
FY 2003 Blue (Exceeded target) 158
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of market access and compliance cases resolved
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 46% / quarter 20% / quarter
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Maintain and strengthen an adaptable and effective U.S. export control and treaty compliance system (BIS)2

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $29.6 $26.5 $24.0 $27.6 $29.8 $25.8 $23.8 $33.4
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 185 184 164 156 190 163 148 153

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent of licenses requiring interagency referral referred within 9 days
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 98% 95%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Median processing time for new regime regulations (months)
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 2.5 3.0
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Blue (Exceeded target) 1.0
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 2.0
FY 2003 Red (Did not meet target) 7.0
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent of attendees rating seminars highly
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 90% 85%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent of declarations received from U.S. industry in accordance with CWC regulations (time lines) that are processed, certified, and submitted to the State Department in time so the United States can meet its treaty obligations
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 100% 100%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

 

Performance Goal: Eliminate illicit export activity outside the global export control and treaty compliance system (BIS)3

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $25.2 $25.9 $27.1 $30.0 $35.0 $33.4 $36.0 $19.9
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 183 175 178 171 226 214 170 80

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of actions that result in a deterrence or prevention of a violation and cases which result in a criminal and/or administrative charge
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 872 350
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Blue (Exceeded target) 583
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 310
FY 2003 Blue (Exceeded target) 250
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 82
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 81
FY 2000 Green (Met target) 93
FY 1999 Red (Did not meet target) 68

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of end-use checks completed
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 942 700
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

 

Performance Goal: Integrate non-U.S. actors to create a more effective global export control and treaty compliance system (BIS)4

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $4.2 $4.3 $5.3 $5.5 $6.0 $7.7 $9.9 $22.3
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 81

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of targeted deficiencies remedied in the export control systems of cooperating countries
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 40 40
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 40
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) 41
FY 2003 Blue (Exceeded target) 39
FY 2002 Blue (Exceeded target) 25
FY 2001   New—no target to measure against

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Ensure continued U.S. technology leadership in industries that are essential to national security (BIS)5

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding New $4.2 $6.5 $4.5 $5.9 $7.0 $7.3 $6.6
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent New 30 22 22 29 22 34 39

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent of industry assessments resulting in BIS determination, within three months of completion, on whether to revise export controls
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Black (N/A) N/A1 100%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against
1 No assessments fell within the metric timeframe in FY 2006. Two industry assessments were completed late in the fourth quarter of FY 2006, thus not meeting the three month window (before the end of the fiscal year) to make a final determination on revising export controls. This was the first year this measure was in place. Industry assessment data will be available in following fiscal years. (back)

 

1 From FY 2002 - FY 2005, this goal was known as “Ensure fair competition in international trade.” (back)
2 From FY 2002 - FY 2005, this goal was known as “Advance U.S. national security, foreign policy, and economic interests by enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of the export control system.” The two measures under the goal “Eliminate illicit activity outside the global export control and treaty compliance system” also apply to this goal. (back)
3 Prior to FY 2006, this goal was known as “Prevent illegal exports and identify violaters of export prohibitions and restrictions for prosecution.” The two measures under this goal also apply to the goal “Maintain and strengthen an adaptable and effective U.S. export control and treaty compliance system.” (back)
4 Prior to FY 2006, this goal was known as “Enhance the export and transit controls of nations seeking to improve their export control system.” (back)
5 This goal replaced the goal “Ensure U.S. industry compliance with the CWC agreement.” (back)
Previous Page | Next Page