Skip Navigation

Appendix A: Performance and Resource Tables

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1.1

Enhance economic growth for all Americans by developing partnerships with private sector and nongovernmental organizations

OBJECTIVE 1.1 RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $703.7 $690.8 $756.9 $677.5 $662.2 $681.4 $605.8 $584.0
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 2,315 2,338 2,240 1,990 2,288 2,272 1,909 1,754

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Increase private investment and job creation in economically distressed communities (EDA)

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding1 $313 $312 $362.3 $296.6 $258.3 $252.4 $213.9 $198.5
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 170 174 165 155 149 134 134 114
1 Actuals reflect direct obligations for economic development assistance programs (EDAP) and salaries and expenses (S&E); totals do not include one-time, disaster investments or reimbursable funding. (back)

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Private investment leveraged - 9 year totals1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) $2,331.1 $1,162.0
1 EDA tracks the results of its investments and jobs created / retained at 3, 6 and 9 year periods. The FY 2006 actual is as a result of investments made in FY 1997. Since EDA did not begin tracking results until FY 1997 in this format, 9 year results are not available for the years prior to FY 2006. (back)

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Private investment leveraged - 6 year totals1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) $1,059.0 $1,020.0
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Blue (Exceeded target) $1,781.0
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) $1,740.0
FY 2003 Blue (Exceeded target) $2,475.0
1 This is the 6 year result measure. FY 2006 actuals are the result of investments made in FY 2000. FY 2005 actuals as a result of investments made in FY 1999 and so on. (back)

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Private investment leveraged - 3 year totals1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) $1,669.0 $320.0
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Blue (Exceeded target) $1,791.0
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) $947.0
FY 2003 Blue (Exceeded target) $1,251.0
FY 2002 Blue (Exceeded target) $640.0
FY 2001 Blue (Exceeded target) $971.0
FY 2000 Blue (Exceeded target) $199.0
1 This is the 3 year result measure. FY 2006 actuals are the result of investments made in FY 2003. FY 2005 actuals as a result of investments made in FY 2002 and so on. (back)

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Jobs created/retained - 9 year totals1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 50,546 50,400
1 EDA tracks the results of its investments and jobs created / retained at 3, 6, and 9 year periods. The FY 2006 actual is as a result of investments made in FY 1997. Since EDA did not begin tracking results until FY 1997 in this format, 9 year results are not available for the years prior to FY 2006. (back)

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Jobs created/retained - 6 year totals1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 42,958 28,200
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Blue (Exceeded target) 47,374
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) 68,109
FY 2003 Blue (Exceeded target) 47,607
1 This is the 6 year result measure. FY 2006 actuals are the result of investments made in FY 2000. FY 2005 actuals as a result of investments made in FY 1999 and so on. (back)

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Jobs created/retained - 3 year totals1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 11,833 9,170
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Blue (Exceeded target) 19,672
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) 21,901
FY 2003 Blue (Exceeded target) 39,841
FY 2002 Blue (Exceeded target) 29,912
FY 2001 Blue (Exceeded target) 12,898
FY 2000 Blue (Exceeded target) 12,056
1 This is the 3 year result measure. FY 2006 actuals are the result of investments made in FY 2003. FY 2005 actuals as a result of investments made in FY 2002 and so on. (back)

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Improve community capacity to achieve and sustain economic growth (EDA)

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding1 $78.0 $74.0 $76.7 $68.8 $67.3 $71.9 $71.3 $67.0
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 92 94 89 84 80 72 73 50
1 Actuals reflect direct obligations for EDAP and S&E; totals do not include one-time, disaster investments or reimbursable funding. (back)

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of economic development districts and Indian tribes implementing economic development projects from the comprehensive economic development strategy that lead to private investment and jobs
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 96% 95%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 97%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 95%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 98.7%
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of sub-state jurisdiction members actively participating in the economic development district program
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 90% 89-93%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 91%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 90.1%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 96.7%
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 95.3%
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 92%
FY 2000 Green (Met target) 91%
FY 1999   New—no target to measure against

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of University Center clients taking action as a result of the assistance facilitated by the University Center
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 76% 75%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 79%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 78.4%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 78.1%
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of those actions taken by University Center clients that achieved the expected results
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 82% 80%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 87%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 88%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 86%
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of Trade Adjustment Assistance Center (TAAC) clients taking action as a result of the assistance facilitated by the TAACs
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 90% 90%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 99%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 90%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 92%
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against

EDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of those actions taken by Trade Adjustment Assistance Center clients that achieved the expected results
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 96% 95%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 97%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 98%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 98%
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Enhance U.S. competitiveness in domestic and international markets (ITA)1

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual1 		FY 2003
Actual1 		FY 2004
Actual1 		FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $155.0 $151.0 $161.0 $208.5 $210.7 $206.3 $52.5 $49.7
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 1,071 1,079 1,038 1,236 1,064 1,250 255 259
1 In FY 2005 ITA reorganized its performance structure, reducing the number of goals from four to two goals for this objective. FYs 2002-2004 actuals shown here reflect the level for the strengthen U.S. industries goal and the two discontinued goals. (back)

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Annual cost savings resulting from the adoption of MAS recommendations contained in MAS studies and analysis
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Red (Did not meet target) $287M $350M
Performance was not met, because:
The annual cost savings metric was not achieved due to the postponed release of an EPA rule related to one of the MAS studies. The rule was scheduled for release in September and was delayed due to prolonged internal EPA clearance and review. This may put ITA above target for this metric in FY 2007.
Strategies for Improvement:
ITA’s MAS program will work closely with agencies to predict rule release dates more accurately to minimize this type of potential externality.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent reduction in per unit cost of data distribution
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 12% 10%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent of agreement milestones completed
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 100% 70%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent of industry-specific trade barrier milestones completed
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Yellow (Slightly below target) 81% 85%
Performance was not met, because:
This measure was first reported in FY 2006, however, MAS had prior year information. MAS exceeded 80 percent in FY 2004 and FY 2005. Based on this strong performance MAS set a target of 85 percent in FY 2006. While MAS did not reach its new target, the achievement of 81 percent of industry-specific trade barrier milestones completed exceeds targets of the previous two years.
Strategies for Improvement:
ITA will determine if external factors impact a percentage range of milestones each quarter and assess if 85 percent is a realistic target based on actual baseline trends in FY 2007.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Exports generated annually from public/private partnerships
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) $446M $267M
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Broaden and deepen U.S. exporter base (ITA)2

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $129 $124 $129.0 $75.3 $97.2 $121.9 $238.6 $238.9
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 886 890 858 423 903 724 1,352 123.7

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of undertaken advocacy cases completed successfully
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Red (Did not meet target) 8.6% 12.0%
Performance was not met, because:
For FY 2006, the Advocacy Center’s percentage of cases successfully completed is artificially low because of an unusually large number of cases carried over from FY 2005. This impacts the calculation of the performance metric by maintaining a larger denominator since the total number of cases is usually higher.
Strategies for Improvement:
ITA will examine this measure and determine what actions can be taken to address maintaining a similar number of open advocacy cases from year to year, thus ensuring minimal variation in the annual success rate.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 12%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 13%
FY 2003 Red (Did not meet target) 10%
FY 2002 Red (Did not meet target) 11.8%
FY 2001   New—no target to measure against

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of new-to-market (NTM) export successes1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Red (Did not meet target) 4,110 4,760
Performance was not met, because:
New-to-market (NTM) Export Success (ES) metrics fell short in FY 2006 due to reduced staffing in the domestic field and the application of more stringent controls such as tightening the ES reporting requirements in response to OIG findings.
Strategies for Improvement:
New-to-export (NTE) and NTM successes require a high degree of personalized service. One way to make up for the lack of federal resources is to partner with private sector service providers that can reach potential exporters. ITA will continue to broaden and deepen strategic partnerships and as these partnerships mature, ITA should begin to see more demand for ITA services and more export successes.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 4,888
FY 2004 Red (Did not meet target) 4,759
FY 2003 Yellow (Slightly below target) 6,278
FY 2002 Yellow (Slightly below target) 5,740
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 5,386
FY 2000   New—no target to measure against
1 From FY 2000 - FY 2005, this measure was “Number of U.S. exporters entering a new market.” (back)

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of increase-to-market (ITM) export successes
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 7,258 5,925
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of new-to-export (NTE) successes1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Red (Did not meet target) 551 700
Performance was not met, because:
NTE Export Success (ES) metrics fell short in FY 2006 due to reduced staffing in the domestic field and the application of more stringent controls such as tightening the ES reporting requirements in response to OIG findings.
Strategies for Improvement:
NTE and NTM successes require a high degree of personalized service. One way to make up for the lack of federal resources is to partner with private sector service providers that can reach potential exporters. ITA will continue to broaden and deepen strategic partnerships and as these partnerships mature, ITA should begin to see more demand for ITA services and more export successes.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Red (Did not meet target) 620
FY 2004 Red (Did not meet target) 704
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 896
FY 2002 Red (Did not meet target) 699
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 742
FY 2000   New—no target to measure against
1 From FY 2000 - FY 2005, this measure was “Number of U.S. firms exporting for the first time.” (back)

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of export successes made as a result of ITA involvement1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 11,919 11,385
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 12,518
FY 2004 Red (Did not meet target) 11,382
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 14,090
FY 2002 Yellow (Slightly below target) 12,178
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 11,160
FY 2000   New—no target to measure against
1 From FY 2000 - FY 2005, this measure was “Number of export transactions made as a result of ITA involvement.” (back)

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of Commercial Service fee funded programs
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 3.0% 3.0%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 2.0%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 2.0%
FY 2003   New—no target to measure against

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Dollar value of advocacy cases completed successfully
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) $33.2B $5.0B
Performance was exceeded because:
The Advocacy Center closed four large cases during the second quarter for Boeing (planes) and GE (engines) with Air India. These four cases, closed at the same time with an estimated $8.25 billion in U.S. export content. The total for these four successes are high compared to most advocacy successes; although, aerospace cases tend to result in high dollar value successes. Please note: It is challenging to predict when cases will close, as there is are no ways of predicting whether this level of success will be repeated in the future.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Increase access to the marketplace and financing for minority-owned businesses (MBDA)

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual		 FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $28.7 $29.8 $27.9 $28.3 $29.0 $28.9 $29.5 $29.9
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 96 101 90 92 92 92 95 94

MBDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Dollar value of contract awards obtained
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) $1.1 $0.85
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) $0.9
FY 2004 Green (Met target) $0.95
FY 2003 Red (Did not meet target) $0.7
FY 2002 Blue (Exceeded target) $1.3
FY 2001 Blue (Exceeded target) $1.6
FY 2000 Blue (Exceeded target) $1.2
FY 1999 Green (Met target) $0.6

MBDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Dollar value of financial awards obtained
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Red (Did not meet target) $0.41 $0.45
Performance was not met, because:
At the Department’s request, MBDA’s focus in 2006 was on obtaining contract opportunities for MBEs in support of the Gulf Coast Relief and Recovery.
Strategies for Improvement:
The new MBEC / NABEC programs will focus on access to capital in 2007.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) $0.5
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) $0.6
FY 2003 Green (Met target) $0.4
FY 2002 Green (Met target) $0.4
FY 2001 Red (Did not meet target) $0.6
FY 2000 Red (Did not meet target) $0.2
FY 1999 Red (Did not meet target) $0.7

MBDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of new job opportunities created
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 4,000 1,800
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 2,000
FY 2004   New—no target to measure against

MBDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent increase in client gross receipts
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 7.5% 5%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Blue (Exceeded target) 15%
FY 2004   New—no target to measure against

MBDA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of national and regional strategic partnerships1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 235 200
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 220
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) 210
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 8
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 6
FY 2001   New—no target to measure against
1 From FY 2002 - FY 2003, this measure did not include regional partnerships. (back)

1 Prior to FY 2006, this goal was known as “Strengthen U.S. industries.” (back)
2 Prior to FY 2006, this goal was known as “Expand U.S. exporter base.” (back)
Previous Page | Next Page