Appendix A: Performance and Resource Tables

MANAGEMENT INTEGRATION GOAL

Achieve organizational and management excellence

PERFORMANCE OUTCOME: Identify and effectively manage human and material resources critical to the success of the Department’s strategic goals (DM)

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE

MEASURE: Provide accurate and timely financial information and conform to federal standards, laws, and regulations governing accounting and financial management1
Year	Status	Actual	Target
FY 2007		Completed migration of Commerce Business System; completed assessment of internal controls; significant deficiency was not eliminated2	Eliminate any significant deficiency within 1 year of determ. Complete internal control and document review. Complete FY 2007 A-123 assessment of internal controls. Migrate Commerce Business System to an all Web-based architecture.
Performance was not met, because: Increased requirements; imposed additional security controls and changes in review methodology resulted in increased number of findings.
Strategies for Improvement: Management has appointed a team from CIO and CFO staffs to monitor issues and resolve any outstanding corrective actions.
Year	Status	Historical Results	Historical Target
FY 2006		Reportable condition not eliminated	Eliminate any reportable condition within 1 year of determ; 95% of management with access to the CRS have financial data / reports by the 15th of month
FY 2005		Reportable condition not eliminated	Eliminate any reportable condition
FY 2004		100%	100%
FY 2003		100%	100%
FY 2002		100%	100%
FY 2001		100%	100%
FY 2000		100%	100%
1 Prior to FY 2005, this was stated as “Clean audit opinion on Department’s consolidated financial statements.” (back) 2 Estimate. (back)

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE

MEASURE: Effectively use competitive sourcing1
Year	Status	Actual	Target
FY 2007		Bureaus identified FY 2008 feasibility studies which were submitted as part of the Green Plan2	Update and/or continue to implement FY 2006 plan to conduct feasibility studies of Department commercial functions to determine potential new competitions / studies in the outyears
Year	Status	Historical Results	Historical Target
FY 2006		Green Plan2 submitted to OMB on 9/28/2006	Finalize new green competition plan based on 8/2005 CFO council outcome
FY 2005		Feasibility studies nominated for 168 FTE	Complete feasibility studies for 168 FTE to det 2005-2006 studies
FY 2004		New FAIR inventory guidance developed	Multi-year plan under development
FY 2003		Completed competition on 6.6%	Complete competitions on 10%
FY 2002		Completed competition on 1%	Complete competitions on 5%
FY 2001		Commercial inventory - submitted 6/30/2001	Commercial inventory - completed by 6/30/01
FY 2000		Commercial inventory - submitted 6/30/2000	Commercial inventory - completed by 6/30/00
1 Prior to FY 2005, this measure was known as “Expand A-76 competitions and more accurate FAIR Act inventories.” (back) 2 Green plan will lay out the Department short- and long-range plans to conduct feasibility studies of all major commercial (and available) functions and will identify approved 2006-2007 competitions. (back)

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE

MEASURE: Obligate funds through performance-based contracting (% of eligible service contracting $)
Year	Status	Actual	Target
FY 2007		28%1	40%
Performance was not met, because: Data problems and resource constraints prevented bureaus and program officers from receiving assistance in understanding performance-based contracting.
Strategies for Improvement: Hardware and software enhancements will provide better data to bureaus and program officers.
Year	Status	Historical Results	Historical Target
FY 2006		30%	50%
FY 2005		< 50%	50%
FY 2004		42%	40%
FY 2003		24%	30%
FY 2002		31%	25%
FY 2001		25%	10%
FY 2000		New—no target to measure against
1 Estimate. (back)

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE

MEASURE: Obligate contracts to small businesses1
Year	Status	Actual	Target
FY 2007		44%2	48%
Performance was not met, because: COMMITS task orders are typically awarded for large dollar amounts. This has had an impact on the percentage of procurement dollars going to small businesses.
Strategies for Improvement: There is a lag time between contract award and data entry into the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). The Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) and the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) are focused on data accuracy. Acquisition offices are spending more time ensuring that data entered into FPDS are accurate, which contributes to the lag time for data entry into FPDS. In addition, the Department is in the process of transferring COMMITS to the General Services Administration (GSA). The COMMITS Program Office has stopped accepting new work as of the end of the second quarter.
Year	Status	Historical Results	Historical Target
FY 2006		48.0%	44.8%
FY 2005		62%	44.8%
FY 2004		62%	42%
FY 2003		45%	40%
FY 2002		51%	42%
FY 2001		S-50% / M-18% / W-9%	S-40% / M-18% / W-5%
FY 2000		S-34% / M-14% / W-5%	S-40% / M-18% / W-5%
1 From FY 2000 - 2001, this measure was split among small (S), minority-owned (M) and women-owned (W) businesses. (back) 2 Estimate. (back)

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE

MEASURE: Acquire and maintain diverse and highly qualified staff in mission-critical occupations
Year	Status	Actual	Target
FY 2007		Trained postsecondary internship program applicants to increase applicant pools; trained managers to make better hiring decisions; trained employees in project management to close skill gaps	Improve recruitment strategies via targeted activities; assist managers in making better selections, close skill gaps
Year	Status	Historical Results	Historical Target
FY 2006		Marketed job vacancies to organizations via automated hiring system; participated in career fairs and special programs; conducted training of managers and employees	Improve recruitment strategies via targeted activities; assist managers in making better selections, close skill gaps
FY 2005		Improved representation in underreported groups from 28 to 29%, maintained 30 day fill time	Improve representation in underreported groups, maintain 30 day fill-time
FY 2004		New—no target to measure against

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE

MEASURE: Improve the management of information technology
Year	Status	Actual	Target
FY 2007		Cost/schedule overruns /performance shortfalls less than 10%. All national critical and mission critical systems certified and accredited.	Cost/schedule overruns /performance shortfalls less than 10%. All national critical and mission critical systems certified and accredited.
Year	Status	Historical Results	Historical Target
FY 2006		Cost overruns and performance shortfalls less than 10%. All national critical & mission critical systems certified & accredited.	Cost/schedule overruns /performance shortfalls less than 10%. All national critical and mission critical systems certified and accredited.
FY 2005		Cost overruns and performance shortfalls less than 10%	Cost overruns and performance shortfalls less than 10%
FY 2004		New—no target to measure against

PERFORMANCE OUTCOME: Promote improvements to Commerce programs and operations by identifying and completing work that (1) promotes integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness; and (2) prevents and detects fraud, waste, and abuse (OIG)

OIG PERFORMANCE MEASURE

MEASURE: Percentage of OIG recommendations accepted by Departmental and bureau management
Year	Status	Actual	Target
FY 2007		96%	95%
Year	Status	Historical Results	Historical Target
FY 2006		96%	95%
FY 2005		99%	90%
FY 2004		98%	90%
FY 2003		97%	90%
FY 2002	1	95%
FY 2001	1	95%
FY 2000	1	96%
1 Prior to FY 2003, OIG had not yet developed targets. However, IG did track data. (back)

OIG PERFORMANCE MEASURE

MEASURE: Dollar value of financial benefits identified by the OIG
Year	Status	Actual	Target
FY 2007		$51.7M	$29.6M
Year	Status	Historical Results	Historical Target
FY 2006		$34.2M	$30.0M
FY 2005		$32.0M	$23.0M
FY 2004		$26.0M	$20.0M
FY 2003		$43.3M	$20.0M
FY 2002		New—no target to measure against

OIG PERFORMANCE MEASURE

MEASURE: Percentage of criminal and civil matters that are accepted for prosecution
Year	Status	Actual	Target
FY 2007		73%	63%
Year	Status	Historical Results	Historical Target
FY 2006		91%	63%
FY 2005		81%	62%
FY 2004		67%	50%
FY 2003		50%	50%
FY 2002		New—no target to measure against