Skip Navigation

Appendix A: Performance and Resource Tables

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1.2

Advance responsible economic growth and trade while protecting American security

OBJECTIVE 1.2 RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual		 FY 2007
Actual
Total Funding $111.6 $126.9 $157.4 $164.9 $168.5 $192.6 $205.4 $196.1
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 757 733 929 940 975 998 986 892

 

PERFORMANCE OUTCOME: Identify and resolve unfair trade practices (ITA)1

PERFORMANCE OUTCOME RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual		 FY 2007
Actual
Total Funding $59.0 $68.0 $92.8 $88.1 $94.6 $115.8 $123.3 $115.2
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 375 360 571 574 610 638 633 526

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of AD/CVD proceedings completed within statutory deadlines
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Green (Met target) 100% 100%
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 100% 100%
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 100% 100%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 100% 100%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 100% 100%
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 100% 100%
FY 2001   New—no target to measure against  

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of market access and trade compliance cases initiated
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Green (Met target) 187 160
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 178 150
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 160 160-170
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 161 150-160
FY 2003 Red (Did not meet target) 144 180-210
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against  

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of market access and compliance cases resolved
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Blue (Exceeded target) 158 120
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 140 80
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 85 75-85
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) 116 50-60
FY 2003 Blue (Exceeded target) 158 30-40
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against  

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of market access and compliance cases resolved successfully
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Blue (Exceeded target) 54% / quarter 25% / quarter
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 46% / quarter 20% / quarter
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against  

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of market access and compliance cases initiated for on behalf of small and medium-sized businesses
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Red (Did not meet target) 22% 30%
Performance was not met, because:
The market access and compliance (MAC) program set both the FY 2006 and FY 2007 targets without a baseline to determine the accuracy of the target range. This “stretch” target was initially established at 30 percent in the MAC PART. Having now reviewed two years of trend data, a more realistic target range is 21 to 23 percent.
Strategies for Improvement:
ITA intends to adjust the target to an ambitious but realistic level for FY 2008 as a corrective action.
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Red (Did not meet target) 28% 30%

ITA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of market access and compliance cases that have an action plan within 10 days of initiation
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Green (Met target) 82% / quarter 75% / quarter
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006   New—no target to measure against  

 

PERFORMANCE OUTCOME: Maintain and strengthen an adaptable and effective U.S. export control and treaty compliance system (BIS)2

PERFORMANCE OUTCOME RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual		 FY 2007
Actual
Total Funding $47.8 $53.6 $58.7 $68.4 $67.7 $71.3 $73.0 $70.4
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 350 342 328 336 335 330 309 324

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent of licenses requiring interagency referral referred within 9 days
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Green (Met target) 98% 95%
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 98% 95%
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against  

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Median processing time for new regime regulations (months)
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Blue (Exceeded target) 2.0 3.0
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 2.5 3.0
FY 2005 Blue (Exceeded target) 1.0 3.0
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) 2.0 3.0
FY 2003 Red (Did not meet target) 7.0 3.0
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against  

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent of attendees rating seminars highly
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Green (Met target) 90% 85%
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 90% 85%
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against  

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent of declarations received from U.S. industry in accordance with CWC regulations (time lines) that are processed, certified, and submitted to the State Department in time so the United States can meet its treaty obligations
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Green (Met target) 100% 100%
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 100% 100%
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against  

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of actions that result in a deterrence or prevention of a violation and cases which result in a criminal and/or administrative charge1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Blue (Exceeded target) 930 450
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 872 350
FY 2005 Blue (Exceeded target) 583 275
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 310 250
FY 2003 Blue (Exceeded target) 250 85
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 82 75
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 81 70
FY 2000 Green (Met target) 93 80
1 Prior to FY 2007, this measure was under the outcome “Eliminate illicit export activity outside the global export control and treaty compliance system;” which was discontinued in FY 2007. (back)

 

PERFORMANCE OUTCOME: Integrate non-U.S. actors to create a more effective global export control and treaty compliance system (BIS)3, 4

PERFORMANCE OUTCOME RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual		 FY 2007
Actual
Total Funding $1.5 $1.6 $1.8 $4.4 $2.7 $1.8 $2.8 $4.6
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 14 13 13 13 13 13 13 12

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Number of end-use checks completed1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Green (Met target) 854 850
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 942 700
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against  
1 Prior to FY 2007, this measure was under the outcome “Eliminate illicit export activity outside the global export control and treaty compliance, which was discontinued in FY 2007. (back)

 

PERFORMANCE OUTCOME: Ensure continued U.S. technology leadership in industries that are essential to national security (BIS)5

PERFORMANCE OUTCOME RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 2000
Actual		 FY 2001
Actual		 FY 2002
Actual		 FY 2003
Actual		 FY 2004
Actual		 FY 2005
Actual		 FY 2006
Actual		 FY 2007
Actual
Total Funding $3.3 $3.7 $4.1 $4.0 $3.5 $3.7 $6.3 $5.9
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 18 18 17 17 17 17 31 30

BIS PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percent of industry assessments resulting in BIS determination, within three months of completion, on whether to revise export controls
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2007 Green (Met target) 100% 100%
Year Status Historical Results Historical Target
FY 2006 Black (N/A) N/A1 100%
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against  
1 No assessments fell within the metric timeframe in FY 2006. BIS completed two industry assessments late in the fourth quarter of FY 2006, thus not meeting the three month window (before the end of the fiscal year) to make a final determination on revising export controls. This was the first year this measure was in place. Industry assessment data will be available in subsequent fiscal years. (back)

 

1 From FY 2002 - FY 2005, this outcome was known as “Ensure fair competition in international trade.” (back)
2 From FY 2002 - FY 2005, this outcome was known as “Advance U.S. national security, foreign policy, and economic interests by enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of the export control system.” (back)
3 From FY 2000 - FY 2005, this outcome was known as “Enhance the export and transit controls of nations seeking to improve their export control systems.” (back)
4 In FY 2007, BIS eliminated the outcome, “Eliminate illicit export activity outside the global export control and treaty compliance system.” The funds that were previously shown for that outcome for FY 2000 - FY 2006, have been added to this outcome. (back)
5 Prior to FY 2006, this outcome was known as “Ensure U.S. industry compliance with the CWC agreement.” (back)
Previous Page | Next Page