Skip Navigation

Appendix A: Performance and Resource Tables

 

MANAGEMENT INTEGRATION GOAL

Achieve organizational and management excellence

MANAGEMENT INTEGRATION GOAL TOTAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual
FY 2000
Actual
FY 2001
Actual
FY 2002
Actual
FY 2003
Actual
FY 2004
Actual
FY 2005
Actual
FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $34.7 $33.0 $60.6 $70.1 $71.2 $72.8 $70.9 $71.8
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent1 207 185 310 319 326 309 292 295
1 The Office of Inspector General (OIG) was not included in the PAR prior to FY 2001. Therefore, its funding and FTE are not included in FYs 1999 and 2000. (back)

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Identify and effectively manage human and material resources critical to the success of the Department’s strategic goals (DM)

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual
FY 2000
Actual
FY 2001
Actual
FY 2002
Actual
FY 2003
Actual
FY 2004
Actual
FY 2005
Actual
FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $34.7 $33.0 $40.7 $49.2 $49.2 $51.8 $49.5 $49.3
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 207 185 171 183 186 181 177 177

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Provide accurate and timely financial information and conform to federal standards, laws, and regulations governing accounting and financial management1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Red (Did not meet target) Reportable condition not eliminated Eliminate any reportable condition within 1 year of determ; 95% of management with access to the CRS have financial data / reports by the 15th of month
Performance was not met, because:
Efforts to eliminate the basis for the MFIA material weakness by improving the quality of system certification and accreditation (C&A) documentation continues Department-wide, largely due to underestimation of the time necessary for adequate testing of system controls and documenting the evidence of control tests and analyses in an acceptable manner.
Strategies for Improvement:
The Department plans to continue the C&A improvement effort and expand C&A training of personnel in FY 2007, with an expectation of removing the basis for the material weakness during calendar year 2007.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Red (Did not meet target) Reportable condition not eliminated
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 100
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 100
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 100
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 100
FY 2000 Green (Met target) 100
FY 1999 Green (Met target) 100
1 Prior to FY 2005, this was stated as “Clean audit opinion on Department’s consolidated financial statements.” (back)

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Effectively use competitive sourcing1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) Green Plan2 submitted to OMB on 9/28/2006 Finalize new green competition plan based on 8/2005 CFO council outcome
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) Feasability studies nominated for I68 FTE
FY 2004 Green (Met target) New FAIR inventory guidance developed
FY 2003 Red (Did not meet target) Completed competition on 6.6%
FY 2002 Red (Did not meet target) Completed competition on 1%
FY 2001 Green (Met target) Commercial inventory - submitted 6/30/2001
FY 2000 Green (Met target) Commercial inventory - submitted 6/30/2000
FY 1999 Green (Met target) Commercial inventory - submitted 7/9/1999
1 From FY 1999 to FY 2000 this measure was shown as “Expand A-76 competitions and more accurate FAIR Act inventories”. (back)
2 Green plan will lay out the Department short- and long-range plans to conduct feasibility studies of all major commercial (and available) functions and will identify approved 2006-2007 competitions. (back)

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Obligate funds through performance-based contracting
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Red (Did not meet target) 30%1 50%
Performance was not met, because:
The Department has established a higher target than the government-wide goal of 40 percent because of the belief that performance based service acquisition is a key mechanism in obtaining higher quality services and developing improved partnerships with industry. However, due to staffing shortages, OAMFA has not had the resources to assist the bureaus and program offices with a better understanding of performance based service acquisition.
Strategies for Improvement:
In FY 2007, staff will be realigned to focus on this issue and develop and commence implementation of a plan of action.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Red (Did not meet target) < 50%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 42%
FY 2003 Red (Did not meet target) 24%
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 31%
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 25%
FY 2000   New—no target to measure against
1 Estimate. (back)

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Obligate contracts to small businesses1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 48.0% 44.8%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 61.7%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 61.95%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 45%
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 51%
FY 2001 Green (Met target) Small Business-50%, Minority-owned Business-18%, Women-owned Business-9%
FY 2000 Red (Did not meet target) Small Business-34%, Minority-owned Business-20%, Women-owned Business-6%
FY 1999 Green (Met target) Small Business-42%, Minority-owned Business-14%, Women-owned Business-5%
1 From FY 1999 to FY 2001 this measure was split among small, minority-owned, and women-owned businesses. (back)

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Acquire and maintain diverse and highly qualified staff in mission-critical occupations
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) Marketed job vacancies to organizations via automated hiring system; participated in career fairs and special programs; conducted training of managers and employees Improve recruitment strategies via targeted activities; assist managers in making better selections, close skill gaps
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) Improved representation in underreported groups from 28 to 29%, maintained 30 day fill time
FY 2004   New—no target to measure against

DM PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Improve the management of information technology
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) Cost overruns and performance shortfalls less than 10%. All national critical & mission critical systems certified & accredited in accordance with the Department’s IT security policy. Efforts continue to improve the quality of the C&A process and documentation. Cost/schedule overruns /performance shortfalls less than 10%. All national critical and mission critical systems certified and accredited.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) Cost overruns and performance shortfalls less than 10%
FY 2004   New—no target to measure against

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Promote improvements to Commerce programs and operations by identifying and completing work that (1) promotes integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness; and (2) prevents and detects fraud, waste, and abuse (OIG)

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual
FY 2000
Actual
FY 2001
Actual
FY 2002
Actual
FY 2003
Actual
FY 2004
Actual
FY 2005
Actual
FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding     $19.9 $20.9 $22.0 $21.0 $21.4 $22.5
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent     139 136 140 128 115 118

OIG PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of OIG recommendations accepted by departmental and bureau management
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 96% 95%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 99%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 97.5%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 97%
FY 2002 1 95%
FY 2001 1 95%
FY 2000 1 96%
1 Prior to FY 2003, OIG had not yet developed targets. However, IG did track data. (back)

OIG PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Dollar value of financial benefits identified by OIG
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) $34.2M $ 30.0M
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Blue (Exceeded target) $32.0M
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) $26.0M
FY 2003 Blue (Exceeded target) $43.3M
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against

OIG PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Percentage of criminal and civil matters that are accepted for prosecution
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 91% 63%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Blue (Exceeded target) 81%
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) 67%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 50%
FY 2002   New—no target to measure against

Previous Page | Next Page