Skip Navigation

Appendix A: Performance and Resource Tables

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3.1

Advance understanding and predict changes in the Earth’s environment to meet America’s economic, social, and environmental needs

OBJECTIVE 3.1 RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual
FY 2000
Actual
FY 2001
Actual
FY 2002
Actual
FY 2003
Actual
FY 2004
Actual
FY 2005
Actual
FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $1,471.9 $1,477.3 $1,614.8 $1,500.8 $1,631.6 $1,123.1 $1,155.0 $1,165.3
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 7,385 6,289 6,690 5,885 5,537 5,363 5,253 5,572

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Serve society’s needs for weather and water information (NOAA)

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual
FY 2000
Actual
FY 2001
Actual
FY 2002
Actual
FY 2003
Actual
FY 2004
Actual
FY 2005
Actual
FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $1,269.4 $1,260.9 $1,376.0 $1,188.8 $1,284.1 $883.6 $898.1 $929.2
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 6,351 5,812 5,997 5,100 4,912 4,760 4,654 4,907

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Tornado warnings lead time (minutes)
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Yellow (Slightly below target) 121 13
Performance was not met, because:
There is a slight risk of not meeting the lead time goals for FY 2006. The lead time value stands at 12.4 minutes, but with very few tornadoes in August and September, this value may not change substantially.
Strategies for Improvement:
The Advanced Warning Operations Course (AWOC) will continue to be offered and updated during FY 2006. The inclusion of Federal Aviation Administration Terminal Doppler Weather Radar data in AWIPS Build OB6 will complement existing WSR-88D data. The Open Radar Data Acquisition (ORDA) platform continues to be deployed. Super Resolution WSR88D data will be added to the ORDA in Build 10 (scheduled for FY 2008). Super resolution data will provide forecasters the capability to view more precise images of tornadic signatures on radar displays, enabling earlier decisions on tornado warning, and reducing false alarms.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 13
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 13
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 13
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 12
FY 2001 Red (Did not meet target) 10
FY 2000 Red (Did not meet target) 10
FY 1999 Green (Met target) 12
1 Projected. Actuals through July 2006. (back)

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Tornado warnings accuracy (%)
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 76%1 76%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 76%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 75%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 79%
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 76%
FY 2001 Yellow (Slightly below target) 67%
FY 2000 Red (Did not meet target) 63%
FY 1999 Green (Met target) 70%
1 Projected. Actuals through July 2006. (back)

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Tornado warnings false alarm rate (%)
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Yellow (Slightly below target) 79%1 75%
Performance was not met, because:
The FY 2006 FAR Goal of 75 percent will not be met. The current value of 78.5 percent has remained relatively unchanged over the last year. There is a strong statistical relationship between accuracy and FAR using current technology and operational methodology. A higher rate of accuracy results in a higher FAR. National Emergency Managers and media surveys have indicated that higher FAR is tolerable if it results in longer lead times and increased accuracy.
Strategies for Improvement:
The Advanced Warning Operations Course (AWOC) will continue to be offered and updated during FY 2006. The inclusion of Federal Aviation Administration Terminal Doppler Weather Radar data in AWIPS Build OB6 will complement existing WSR-88D data. The Open Radar Data Acquisition (ORDA) platform continues to be deployed. Super Resolution WSR88D data will be added to the ORDA in Build 10 (scheduled for FY 2008). Super resolution data will provide forecasters the capability to view more precise images of tornadic signatures on radar displays, enabling earlier decisions on tornado warning, and reducing false alarms.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Red (Did not meet target) 77%
FY 2004 Red (Did not meet target) 74%
FY 2003 Red (Did not meet target) 76%
FY 2002 Yellow (Slightly below target) 73%
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 73%
FY 2000 Red (Did not meet target) 76%
FY 1999 Yellow (Slightly below target) 73%
1 Projected. Actuals through July 2006. (back)

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Flash flood warnings lead time (minutes)
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 501 48
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 54
FY 2004 Red (Did not meet target) 47
FY 2003 Red (Did not meet target) 41
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 52
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 46
FY 2000 Red (Did not meet target) 43
FY 1999 Red (Did not meet target) 44
1 Projected. Actuals through July 2006. (back)

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Flash flood warnings accuracy (%)
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Yellow (Slightly below target) 88%1 89%
Performance was not met, because:
For the October-July timeframe, NWS is exceeding the lead time, but slightly below the accuracy for the FY 2006 annual performance goals. As noted above, at this time of year results are expected to fall. It is anticipated that these measures will continue to decline as the convective season progresses.
Strategies for Improvement:
Enhancements to AWIPS, ASOS, NERON, and WSR-88D radar are being made to improve performance.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 89%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 89%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 89%
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 89%
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 86%
FY 2000 Green (Met target) 86%
FY 1999 Yellow (Slightly below target) 83%
1 Projected. Actuals through July 2006. (back)

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Hurricane forecast track error (48 hours) (nautical miles)
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 1011 111
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 101
FY 2004 Blue (Exceeded target) 94
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 107
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 122
FY 2001   New—no target to measure against
1 Projected. Final data will be available in February 2007. Because of the time lag, and that this measure in the FY 2005 PAR was reported as “N/A” for FY 2005, the updated results for FY 2005 are used for evaluation purposes, giving the performance a “met” result. (back)

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Accuracy (%) (threat score) of day 1 precipitation forecasts1
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 30 28
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 29
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 29
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 29
FY 2002 Blue (Exceeded target) 26
FY 2001 Red (Did not meet target) 19
FY 2000 Red (Did not meet target) 16
FY 1999   New—no target to measure against
1 From FYs 2000 - FY 2002, this was accuracy of 3-day forecast. (back)

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Winter storm warnings lead time (hours)
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 17 15
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 17
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 15
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 14
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 13
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 13
FY 2000 Red (Did not meet target) 9
FY 1999   New—no target to measure against

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Winter storm warnings accuracy (%)
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Yellow (Slightly below target) 89% 90%
Performance was not met, because:
During the third quarter, the cumulative percentage dropped to 89 percent when rounded from .8944 which is below the FY 2006 goal of 90 percent.
Strategies for Improvement:
Enhancements to NERON and models such as Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) are being made to allow more precise and timely warnings.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 91%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 91%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 90%
FY 2002 Green (Met target) 89%
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 90%
FY 2000 Green (Met target) 85%
FY 1999   New—no target to measure against

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Cumulative percentage of U.S. shoreline and inland areas that have improved ability to reduce coastal hazard impacts
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 32% 32%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 28%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 17%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 17%
FY 2002 Red (Did not meet target) 8%
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 8%
FY 2000 Red (Did not meet target) 8%
FY 1999 Green (Met target) 7%

 

PERFORMANCE GOAL: Understand climate variability and change to enhance society’s ability to plan and respond (NOAA)

PERFORMANCE GOAL RESOURCES
(Dollars in Millions)
  FY 1999
Actual
FY 2000
Actual
FY 2001
Actual
FY 2002
Actual
FY 2003
Actual
FY 2004
Actual
FY 2005
Actual
FY 2006
Actual
Total Funding $202.5 $216.4 $238.8 $312.0 $347.5 $239.5 $256.9 $236.1
FTE – Full-Time Equivalent 1,034 477 693 785 625 603 599 665

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: U.S. temperature forecasts (cumulative skill score computed over the regions where predictions are made)
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Blue (Exceeded target) 25 18
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 19
FY 2004 Red (Did not meet target) 17
FY 2003 Red (Did not meet target) 17
FY 2002 Red (Did not meet target) 18
FY 2001 Green (Met target) 20
FY 2000 Green (Met target) 25
FY 1999 Green (Met target) 23.3

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Reduce the uncertainty in the magnitude of the North American (NA) carbon uptake
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 0.40 GtC/yr 0.40 GtC/yr
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) 0.40 GtC/yr
FY 2004 Green (Met target) 0.50 GtC/yr
FY 2003 Green (Met target) 0.80 GtC/yr
FY 2002 Green (Met target) Identified 5 pilot sites and 4 carbon tracks
FY 2001   New—no target to measure against

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Reduce the uncertainty in model simulations of the influence of aerosols on climate
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 10% Establish 10% improvement
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Determine the national explained variance (%) for temperature and precipitation for the contiguous United States using USCRN stations
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) Temperature-97.0% Precipitation-91.8% Temperature-97.0% Precipitation-91.4%
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005 Green (Met target) Temperature-96.9% / Precipitation-91.4%
FY 2004 Green (Met target) Temperature-96% / Precipitation-90%
FY 2003 Green (Met target) Temperature-95%/ Precipitation-84%
FY 2002 Blue (Exceeded target) Temperature-85%/ Precipitation-55%
FY 2001   New—no target to measure against

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Reduce the error in global measurement of sea surface temperature
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Red (Did not meet target) 0.53șC 0.5șC
Performance was not met, because:
The measure actual is slightly below the target of .5șC, due to drifting buoys not being in the right place at the right time.
Strategies for Improvement:
NOAA will continue to refine the deployment of the buoys to cover these gaps.
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

NOAA PERFORMANCE MEASURE
MEASURE: Improve society’s ability to plan and respond to climate variability and change using NOAA climate products and information
Year Status Actual Target
FY 2006 Green (Met target) 33 assessments/evaluations 32 assessments/evaluations
Year Status Historical Results
FY 2005   New—no target to measure against

 


Previous Page | Next Page